Opinion Article

Assesment of the Complications of Pulmonary Vein Isolation Using and Risk Indicators in Big Community Hospital

M Haj Abdo1*, L S Ziegelmeier1, P Reiche1, V Thaci-Kadriu1 and K Seidl1

Department of Reproductive & Child Health Research Scientist, ICMR-NICED, Kolkata, India

Received: November 09, 2022; Published: November 14, 2022

*Corresponding author: M Haj Abdo, Department of cardiology, Klinikum Ingolstadt, Ingolstadt, Germany

Copyright: © 2022 Dr. M Haj Abdo, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

DOI: 10.71205/KPJCMCR/1006

Opinion

Background Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has become a cornerstone of the invasive treatment of atrial fibrillation. A variety of techniques has been used to the (PVI) like cryoballon (CB), conventional radiofrequency (C-RF) and multielectrode phased radiofrequency ablation (MP-RF) [1]. Mild and moderate complication are reported in 8-10 % and severe complications in 1-3 % [2,3].

Aim oft he study This study aims to compare complications and follow-up outcome of PVI in patients with paroxysmale atrial fibrillation .

Methods The data were extracted from the Klinikum Ingolstadt/ Germany. Procedural and follow-up outcomes in patients treated with conventional radiofrequency or cryoballon ablation from 06.2015 to 06.2016 were compared. Subgroup analysis was performed to identify variables associated with complications .

Results 549 patients, 224 women and 325 men were included in the analysis,mean body mass index was 29.15 ( +/- 5.66 kg/m²), mean CHA2Ds2Vasc score was 2.3 ( +/- 1.5) and mean age was 62.59 ( +/-10.30 years)


Citation: Haj Abdo M, Ziegelmeier LS, Reiche P, Thaci-Kadriu1 V and Seidl1 K. Assesment of the Complications of Pulmonary Vein Isolation Using and Risk Indicators in Big Community Hospital. KP J Clin Med Case Rep. 2022; 1(2); 1006.